Herskind Workman posted an update 1 month, 1 week ago
Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud should be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone isn’t enough to stream.
Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.
Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).
Web app is supported. It’s rudimentary, but it’s possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.
p2p 순위 File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as the next cloud is concerned).
It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.
In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. The next cloud only should be in a folder.
You have to share a URL and that means you can’t share music files or videos.
According to the report, there exists a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It’s even worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It’s far better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***
It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it’s the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play around 192kpbs continuously, let’s assume that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it’s often take off at that point)
It has a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is contained in a document, it is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it’s about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you’re in a place where the 3G environment isn’t smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it’s in that state, you need to find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, you’ll find nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.
It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you focus on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. This can be a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to connect to other Google services such as Gmail.
If you don’t upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played immediately. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn’t bother me.
There are probably the most apps which can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs on the computer. It’s a bit of a problem that the app doesn’t connect at all on mobile, but it’s the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn’t stipulated by company policy.
If you use Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it’s the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs applied to computers.Could it be obvious?)
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It’s the best in the world when it comes to media reading.
There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It’s a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn’t work with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB per day. It’s practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.
The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards…
There is a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected in real time when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn’t flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself can’t be documented.
There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. In order to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.
Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped on the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little use of the web page’s resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is quite disadvantageous. It’s even worse than Google Drive, which says it’s disadvantageous above. It’s better to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it’s better than Dropbox, but it’s significantly less than Google Drive).
It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***
The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive’s may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we’ve often used. And there’s also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn’t that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.